Відео

You must have a phd in yapping 😂😂

New and exciting ways to confuse flat earthers.

This was strange. Just 20 minutes ago, I was imagining making a video where a curve that looks like a parabola up close is actually an ellipse when you zoom out. And then I get recommended this!

Great video!

Came for the graphics, stayed for the graphics I feel like I just wasted a little over 10 minutes on math I didn't bother to understand... Of course it's totally a me problem but I still feel a bit miffed about it :P I wonder what happens if you make the lines stop being parallel and slowly converge at some point but never quite touch That probably sounds silly when you think about it but I want to experiment with it

But perspective doesn't turn parallel lines into intersecting lines, it turns them into curves...

like how you used your own music for the intro

9:37 I bet this is related to the fact that gravity draws parabolas (at our scale) but also elipses (at very big scales).

Excellent.

I don't understand a thing of what this video said. But it reminds me of when I heard that anything is possible at infinity.

Just wow.

18:44 THE SIXTH DIMENSION????????

The Fermat’s Last Theorem cameo hit me like a ton of bricks

🙏🙏👍👍

Moar

Fantastic video.

dang it, now I have to deal with another fundamental theorem too?

6:40 wouldn't it be more accurate to say that bd/ad≈b/a which in fact can be very far from 1 Edit: nvm I'm dumb

Very good video

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

This helped me find where to look for more information about the point at infinity. Thank you!

11:11 YES. finally someone said it -∞ and +∞ are the *same*. everything works the same at that. one graph that shows this very well is y=1/x, where both go to ∞. it looks like different directions, but really the number line just loops at infinity.

This video has made so many things so much clearer to me.

10:02 At last, I understand homogeneous coordinates

If a parabola can be viewed as an ellipse through perspective, how does the directrix come into play here, I’m interpreting this as meaning that ellipses have their own equivalent of a directrix, and by extension, the rest of the conic sections do as-well.

18:44 chatgpt said a complex projective plane can be represented in a 4d real manifold, not 6d, is this correct?

Mind opening! Well done 🙏

Wow!

26:36 you mean, once you circle the last number that is less than the square root...

Beautiful Explanation!! You deserve an oscar👌👌👌👌👌

1:18 1:14

Hi Bill! A question: Where did the "1.5" factor for the outliers estimation come from?

Excellent!👌

thank you so much for posting these, you teach so well! so concise yet nothing important is left out. I tried so hard to learn thru just reading the textbook and it seemed impossible. but one video of yours made it seem so easy!

i like art and math and geometries ths is for me

This is the best video on that topic so far, your visualizations are extremely helpful

Great video Mr Shillito! It solved many of my questions. Thank you very much!

Not just bikes past this along. Jeez

Very well explained!

You said we dont really have the tools to prove the power rule. But why not look at the limit of the quotient of delta f over delta x and expand the power?

I'm confused, isn't this sampling distribution closer to a binomial distribution? And it only looks like a normal distribution (in the limit) when p is far from 0 or 1? Edit: ahh, you have a sample size qualification that accounts for p and q! Carry on then :)

Bottom caption at 18:37 - sorry, no can do. Even Mr. Mxyzptlk couldn't (one dimension too many).

projective algebra is the coolest thing ive ever seen

what is the intro music?

thank u very much

20:20 lmfao

15:23 Why are you allowed to just add z?

Thanks

Thank you for your simple explanation